Hi, sorry to jump in late..
On Wednesday 02 December 2009 04:52:35 Alex Dupre wrote: > Gergely CZUCZY ha scritto: > >> Oh come on. Security-wise you shouldn't hold php at all. It's about > >> backwards incompatibility, not about security. > > PHP 5.3 is not more incompatible with 5.2 than 5.2 was with 5.1 (and 5.1 > with 5.0). 5.2 branch will be dropped in near future, so I'm not going > to maintain 80 (eighty) additional ports just for fun. Would it be interesting to see which ports break with 5.3 and fix these or mark them broken before/at the same time 5.3 hits the tree? Also, the impact of the 5.3 incompatibilities is much larger then 5.1 to 5.2, even though the number is similar. -- Mel _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
