Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
On Sat, 06 Feb 2010 21:05:54 +0100
Miroslav Lachman<000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
Matthew Seaman wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 06/02/2010 09:40, Heino Tiedemann wrote:
Shouldn't there be an entry in UPDATING, that "jpeg" has to be
rebuildet first?
I rebuilded everything - but i have no idea about the order aof
port reinstalling.
Actually that's not necessary in this case entirely because the
commit was so large. Every port that needs to be rebuilt because
it depends on libjpeg has had it's PORTREVISION bumped. That means
that if you just do a 'portupgrade -a' or 'portmaster -a' the right
thing will happen automatically.
No metter if there is revision bump or not, it should be in UPDATING
as it was in case of jpeg-7.
20090719:
AFFECTS: users of graphics/jpeg
AUTHOR: din...@freebsd.org
The IJG jpeg library has been updated to version 7.0. Please
rebuild all ports that depend on it.
No need, since it a port has a new version, a rebuild is expected.
Is expected, but if somebody are not using portmaster or portupgrade,
simple upgrade of jpeg will break other ports and I think that in the
case of jpeg (widely used library) there will be a lot of users asking
"why my app XYZ is not working anymore".
So what was the reason to put UPDATING entry 20090719 for jpeg 7, if it
is no longer needed for jpeg 8?
Miroslav Lachman
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
