On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 10:23:51 -0500 Steven Kreuzer <skreu...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> Hello- > > As documented in http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/144277 > we have two ports with the same name: > > Port: gag-2.9 > Path: /usr/ports/security/gag > Info: A stacheldraht (DOS attack) agent detector > Maint: po...@freebsd.org > B-deps: > R-deps: > WWW: http://www.washington.edu/People/dad/ > > Port: gag-4.9 > Path: /usr/ports/sysutils/gag > Info: Graphical Boot Manager > Maint: alepul...@freebsd.org > B-deps: > R-deps: > WWW: http://gag.sourceforge.net/ > > I am looking for some advice on whats the best course of action to deal with > this. > > My gut feeling is that sysutils/gag should remain the same and that > security/gag should be > renamed to security/gag-stacheldraht. > > Anyone vehemently opposed to this? > So where's the problem? sysutils/gag doesn't seem to install a binary which would conflict with security/gag. In fact, it doesn't seem to install an executable at all, based on examining the Makefile and pkg-plist. --- Gary Jennejohn _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
