Quoting Florent Thoumie <f...@xbsd.org> (from Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:00:53 +0000):

It could serve as a proof of concept and would
show more clearly what you have in mind. Done nicely, it also allows to keep
a lot of the stuff in the Makefile and only write such scripts by hand if
absolutely necessary (think about e.g. "CREATE_USER=name1:UID1 name2:UID2"
which would already cover a lot if not most use cases).

CREATE_USER? Have you been living under a rock recently? :-)

Seems so... but hey, not every port creates users, so I feel free to reject the pointy hat. :)

I suppose Garrett sent this email to get a feel of what the general
consensus was. If it turns out that people agree we should get rid of
those lines, then I'm sure we can find people willing to do the
necessary work.

Personally I do not care if those lines vanish or not, but I agree that it would be a good idea to create some kind of library of common stuff (which includes the cleanup of existing stuff as time permits). This library does not need to do this stuff the same way as it is done currently, if the new way is more easy (in whatever way makes sense here) for the person porting some software. The see several benefits in the pre-/post-install way and no obvious harm in case the script is created automatically by the ports collection most of the time.

Or in short: ++vote;

Bye,
Alexander.

--
Watership Down:
You've read the book.  You've seen the movie.  Now eat the stew!

http://www.Leidinger.net    Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org       netchild @ FreeBSD.org  : PGP ID = 72077137
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to