On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:23:00 -0700, David O'Brien <obr...@freebsd.org>
articulated:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Bash 4.1 seems stable enough at PL5 to replace version 4.0 in
> '/usr/ports/shells/bash'.
>
> Does anyone feel that we need a "shells/bash40" port?
> (please just let me know if you feel we do, not if you feel we don't)
>
> The patch below is the upgrade to 4.1. It works on the workstation
> undermydesk, but maybe not the one underyourdesk. Please let me know
> in the next few days if you will have trouble with the updated Bash
> port.
I don't see any reason to keep it around. In reality, it just clutters
up the ports system with more deprecated software. In any case, "4.1"
corrects a few problems in the older version. I believe it is at patch
level 5 now, as your patch indicates.
Just my 2ยข.
--
Jerry
freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__________________________________________________________________
Man is a military animal,
Glories in gunpowder, and loves parade.
P. J. Bailey
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
