On Tue June 15 2010 09:10:49 Janne Snabb wrote: > As a previous poster pointed out, I also think that the different > BSD licences should be separated.
Yes, they really are different licenses. Who else should it know better than the FreeBSD Project (and NetBSD, OpenBSD, DragonflyBSD, ...)? ;-) > I also second the previous posters' opinion that in specifying GPL > related licenses, it is necessary to distinguish between "this > version only" and "or any later version". It makes a big difference > in license compatibility. Yeah, thanks! > If these distinctions are not made, the whole framework is not very > useful. I would rather see it to be useful. As I wrote ... -- Regards
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
