2010/7/14 Jim Pazarena <fpo...@paz.bz>: > Sahil Tandon wrote: >> >> [mail/dspam maintainer Cc:'d] >> >> On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 09:46:04 +0200, David DEMELIER wrote: >> >>> 2010/7/13 Sahil Tandon <sa...@freebsd.org>: >>>> >>>> On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 21:28:56 +0200, David DEMELIER wrote: >>> >>> Yes sometime I'm nasty with people, I'm sorry about that but when I >>> saw this port I just didn't understand. >> >> What did you not understand? >> >>> I apologize for my english. >> >> No apology needed, as that is not the problem here. > > my own ports confusion (in general) is that in some ports > you use a "-Dxxxxxx" to define a required (or not required) option > while in others (at least dspam) you use WITHOUT_xxx or WITH_xxx=1. > It would be nice if all ports has the same standard of definitions. > > Or... am I confused?
If FreeBSD people agree, KNOBS will be removed in the future (but this will take a long long time). -- Demelier David _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
