Doug Barton <do...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Mon, 26 Jul 2010, Emanuel Haupt wrote: > > > Doug Barton <do...@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> ports/net-im/libpurple/files/patch-libpurple_protocols_oscar_oscar.c > >> has been added to the latest version, so the patch is no longer > >> needed. > > > > Also, the PLIST is broken if the PERL option is specified: > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~ehaupt/buildlogs/libpurple-2.7.2.log > > > > Maybe from time to time a QAT exp run with inverted OPTIONS values > > would be revealing. > > As I said on IRC yesterday, there is no reason to expect that simply > inverting OPTIONS would work. A lot of OPTIONS are not binary, and > the defaults are chose to work together, often in harmony with the > dependencies that they trigger. > > Put another way, it does not logically follow that if "A, B, and !C" > works that "!A, !B, and C" would also work.
I didn't assume that. It would be an easy way to spot simple mistakes such as incomplete package lists, unfetchable optional distfiles, things like that. Emanuel _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
