On 28/07/2010 15:15, Marcin Wisnicki wrote: > On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:03:21 -0700, perryh wrote: > >> Marcin Wisnicki <mwisnicki+free...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> At this very moment, french package mirror has INDEX newer than in >>> other mirrors: >>> >> ... >>> >>> yet it does not have those packages. >>> >>> How could something like this happen ? >> >> By being examined while a resync was in process: evidently the new INDEX >> file had been transferred but that package file (and likely others) were >> still in transit or perhaps not even started yet. Mirroring is not an >> instantaneous process. > > Yeah that was it, but it is really, really bad. > Mirroring must be atomic (mirror to temporary directory then rename). > Otherwise there is a large window of time every couple of days when upgrading > packages will at best fail or leave you with broken system. > I did binary upgrade with pkg_upgrade yesterday and half of my system was > linked > against wrong libintl version :(
The next version of pkg_upgrade will check every downloaded package against the master server after completing the download. I expect to release it at the end of September. Regards -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
