> On Jul 28, 2010, at 11:13 AM, David Southwell wrote: > > In that case should the port not call for 26? > > > > Here is an extract from my pkgdb from which you can see python26 is > > installed on the system. If the port needs 26 surely should it not call > > for it as a dependency rather than failing because python31-3.1.2_1 is > > present?? > > You'd have to discuss that with <gn...@freebsd.org>. However, you would > certainly save time if you kept /usr/local/bin/python as a link to > python2.6 instead of to python-3.x. > > Regards, I believe the porters handbook recomends that ports should set the appropriate python environment at build time to prevent this problem occuring.
David Photographic Artist Permanent Installations & Design Creative Imagery and Advanced Digital Techniques High Dynamic Range Photography & Official Portraiture Combined darkroom & digital creations & Systems Adminstrator for the vizion2000.net network _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
