Just curious, is it really true that portupgrade is "abandonware" ?
I think I have seen some updates to it on the ports tree in the last six months ... thanks, -Ed. On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Sandra Kachelmann <s.kachelm...@googlemail.com> wrote: > I've been using ports-mgmt/portupgrade pretty much ever since it > started to exist. Unfortunately portupgrade seems to be pretty much > "abandonware" so I've been told to move on to portmaster. Despite the > very long manpage I can't seem to be able to achieve the following > thing with portmaster: > > $ portupgrade --batch -a > > If I issue this command I know exactly that I can go out, have a > drink, cook some dinner and unlock my workstation the next day and > find that everything completed unless a port failed to build. With > portmaster I get asked a s*t load of interactive questions, whether I > want to delete some package, whether it's really okay to pull in all > the dependencies and so on. > > Can someone spoonfeed me the command I need to issue with portmaster > in order to achieve the same thing as with > > $ portupgrade --batch -a > > Is that even possible? > > $ portupgrade --batch -a > > Thanks in advance! > > Sandra > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
