On 17/09/2010 00:35, Anonymous wrote: > Dominic Fandrey <kamik...@bsdforen.de> writes: > >> On 16/09/2010 19:17, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: >>> * Dominic Fandrey (kamik...@bsdforen.de) wrote: >>> >>>> Just out of curiosity, why a version bump because of a build >>>> dependency? >>>> >>>> I don't think an autoconf update should have an effect on any >>>> /running/ software but build systems. And I don't see how rebuilding >>>> all the software improves it. >>>> >>>> This is not a criticism - I just think there is something I don't >>>> understand and that worries me. > > My guess is to uncover *early* build failures that exp-run didn't catch. > Example is the breakage of databases/postgresql84-server + WITH_ICU. > >>> I second the question. Revision bump seem absolutely unnecessary. >> >> There was the sweeping commit reason in another thread. >> > >> But I don't really think it would have been a sweeping commit if >> it weren't for the version bump. > > Did you forget that autoconf262 was removed?
I don't get it. I've been really dumb a couple of times lately. Maybe that's it. So if you have the patience, explain it like you would to a dumb person. Regards -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"