Nice to know that amule will get more frequent updates, and the new knobs are great as well, but isn't risky to use snapshots for a port? Are there any policies about what to base a port upon?
And yes, you are correct about the availability of the sparc64 packages. Can the new knobs be used to do a gui-less build of amule? Thanx Paolo 2010/9/22 Anonymous <swel...@gmail.com> > Paolo Bormida <pborm...@gmail.com> writes: > > > Does amule2 port switched from a stable 2.2.5 release to a daily > > snapshot? > > Yes, snapshots are gonna be used unless there are more frequent releases > upstream. You can find the history of changes on freshports. > > http://www.freshports.org/net-p2p/amule2 > > The package name also switched from `aMule' to `amule' in order to > remove silly vendor capitalization and match port *directory* name. > > Besides, I plan to rename the port to plain `amule' with the next update > in order to remove last bit of confusion, i.e. `2' version suffix in > port directory name and in LATEST_LINK. > > > Does the sparc64 port still has the daily snapshot instead of the more > > up-to-date 2.2.6_4 available? > > aMule-10266.tbz and amule-10275.tbz are newer than aMule-2.2.6_4.tbz > unless I'm missing smth. > > $ pkg_version > aMule < > $ portmaster -L > ===>>> aMule-2.2.6_4 > ===>>> New version available: amule-10275 > > I can only find aMule-10266.tbz for sparc64 for 8-stable, though. > -- ----------------------- Paolo Bormida Giaveno - Torino ----------------------- Italy ----------------------- _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"