On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 11:02:01PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 05:38:21PM -0700, Rob Farmer wrote: > > However, I still think it would benefit everyone if the maintainer > > could provide an explanation for some of the current behavior and > > would at least be open to discussion about changing it. The biggest > > problem here, IMHO, is not the OPTIONS issue, but rather the use of > > GTK 1 as the default. > > I have commented on GTK2 (explained) in the past.
Oh, I forgot to mention that I don't find the Vim gtk2 icons near as intuitive as the gtk1 ones. And I really take the mswin'ifcation of UNIX (gtk2 refers to "folder", where gtk1 calls the things "directory") And most of all I totally cannot stand the GNOME dumbass reversal of umpteen years of UNIX ordering of [OK] vs. [Cancel] boxes. The GNOME folks have now created major inconstancy in the ordering of the various applications I run depending on if it is a basic Motif, KDE, or GNOME toolkit consumer. The ordering inconstancy has caused my muscle memory to choose the wrong thing (loosing data). -- -- David (obr...@freebsd.org) _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"