On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 2:51 AM, RW <rwmailli...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:31:24 +0200 Guido Falsi <m...@madpilot.net> wrote: > >> I have noticed on the machines I use/administer a bias towards >> portsnap5.
> If you define a cache environment variable the random choice is seeded > by that to improve the caching. There may also be some weighting in the > SRV record. Yep - update5 is currently weighted 50% in the SRV: $ host -t srv _http._tcp.update.freebsd.org _http._tcp.update.freebsd.org has SRV record 1 35 80 update4.FreeBSD.org. _http._tcp.update.freebsd.org has SRV record 1 50 80 update5.FreeBSD.org. _http._tcp.update.freebsd.org has SRV record 1 5 80 update3.FreeBSD.org. _http._tcp.update.freebsd.org has SRV record 1 10 80 update2.FreeBSD.org. Royce _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
