On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 08:20:28PM +0200, Andrew W. Nosenko wrote: [snip] > Seems, like you think that Xerces authors use libNAME-VER.so naming > scheme, while FreeBSD uses libNAME.so.VER ...
Just as a data point, it's possible (I'm not sure if it's the case with Xerces, but it *is* the case with other libraries) that the OP is right. The Debian Policy Manual recently had to be amended a bit to allow for shared library files named as libfoo-<version>.so; for a full discussion (long!... no, I mean it - *really* long!), see: http://bugs.debian.org/509932 So it seems that there are projects that actually do it that way. G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev r...@space.bg r...@ringlet.net r...@freebsd.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 "yields falsehood, when appended to its quotation." yields falsehood, when appended to its quotation.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
