On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 23:33 +0330, Bahman Kahinpour wrote: > Does anyone think that having an optional APT system somewhere like in > the Ports Collection or ...
You already know where the "..." is, it's called "Debian GNU/kFreeBSD". I have been told that both its users are perfectly happy with apt-system and everything else that accompanies it and then for the rest, there's this other thing called "FreeBSD". Or are you offering yourself to develop a completely new, standalone and parallel ports-like/package infrastructure for FreeBSD and maintain it? If so, then seriously, good luck with that. > ... can be advantageous? No. m. -- Michal Varga, Stonehenge (Gmail account) _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"