On 03/19/11 16:34, Denny Lin wrote:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:28:04AM -0700, Patrick Powell wrote:
On 03/19/11 00:02, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:07:28 -0600
"Edwin L. Culp W."<edwinlc...@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm assuming that we are close to having firefox4 in the tree as
firefox. It can't be too soon. I have not found any drawbacks to it
in the couple weeks of testing.
Unfortunately, it still goes crazy like the older versions and eats 100%
of the CPU for no apparent reason.
Otherwise it's no worse than 3.x was.
Ummm... does it support Java? There were some issues with newer versions
of firefox requiring newer versions of the JDK which have not been
ported/updated.
Use java/openjdk6:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/desktop-browsers.html#MOZ-JAVA-PLUGIN
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=21010
For various reasons, unless there are no other options, I would prefer
to use Solaris JDK
as then I would have one consistent Java version on a slew (i.e. - more
than I want to think about)
systems that I would have to update, test, etc.etc.etc.
Patrick ("One version to rule them, One set of bugs to confuse them,
and in the Virtual Machine bind them") Powell
--
Patrick Powell Astart Technologies
papow...@astart.com 1530 Jamacha Road, Suite X,
Network and System San Diego, CA 92019
Consulting 858-874-6543
Web Site: www.astart.com
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
