--On April 28, 2011 10:52:32 PM +0200 Matthias Andree <mand...@freebsd.org>
wrote:
Am 28.04.2011 21:07, schrieb Chip Camden:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but as I understand it committers have commit
privilege for all ports. What if certain qualified port maintainers who
aren't committers were nevertheless given commit access for only the leaf
ports that they maintain? Wouldn't that speed up the overall process?
It looks like you're asking for a technical solution to a non-technical
problem. Chris Rees has posted an archive link, and my take is that
we're already trying to ask such "qualified port maintainers" to become
ports committers and not care too much about how fine-grained ports
access is.
I personally think it's a bad idea for a port maintainer to be the
committer for their own ports. Getting even minor changes committed to the
tree should require two independent sets of eyes.
--
Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst
As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions
are my own and not those of my employer.
*******************************************
"It is as useless to argue with those who have
renounced the use of reason as to administer
medication to the dead." Thomas Jefferson
"There are some ideas so wrong that only a very
intelligent person could believe in them." George Orwell
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
