On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 00:05:16 -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote: > [ adding portmgr@ to the chain since we're in bpmk territory] > > On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 15:09:49 +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > > > Sahil Tandon wrote: > > >On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 00:04:14 +0200, olli hauer wrote: > > > > > >>No, you don't hit the limitation. It seems you really found a bug in > > >>the Framework! > > >> > > >> From the Framework code in bsd.port.mk existing groups should honored. > > > > > >Along those lines, what about using groupmod instead of usermod? > > >Perhaps due to my ignorance, it seems more straightforward and does not > > >require much sed-fu; I've attached a (probably incomplete) patch to > > >illustrate my thinking. I understand what I am suggesting could > > >introduce other problems, so please do not construe it as an as-is > > >suggestion, but rather something to stoke discussion. > > > > I tested your patch and it works for me. > > [ .. ] > > > Thank you for your time and working solution.
I filed ports/159577 for portmgr review. -- Sahil Tandon <sa...@freebsd.org> _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
