Chris Rees wrote: > On 19 August 2011 08:55, Helmut Schneider <jumpe...@gmx.de> wrote: > > Mark Linimon wrote: > > > >> Sorry, I did not see your message and emailed you separately. > >> > >> GNATS has a spamcatcher for > 500k messages (mostly this catches > >> viruses). Normally I handle such PRs manually before the cleanup > >> process runs, but I forgot to do it this time. (I only took a > >> glance.) > >> > >> Does the plist change dramatically every time the ports are > >> updated? > > > > Yes. > > > >> Is there any way around this if so? Such large changes put stress > >> not only on GNATS (it is, after all, a database), but also on the > >> CVS repository when the updates are committed. > > > > I generated the plist in the past but not very long time ago I was > > told (and let me quote): "generation the plist is not considered a > > good practice" :) > > > > Except when the plist changes dramatically. See Perter's Handbook :)
Will the maintainer who proposed me to create a static plist please stand up, please stand up, please stand up? ;) _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
