On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 16:45:41 +0200 (CEST) Oliver Fromme <o...@lurza.secnetix.de> wrote:
> Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > > Does anyone have any suggestions on how to deal with the conflict > > between the ports libGL and nvidia-driver? > > > > Both install their own version of /usr/local/lib/libGL.so.1. > > Obviously, if you're using the nvidia driver, you need nvidia's > > version and not libGL's version, but many other ports also depend > > on libGL. > > > > I'm not quite sure how to deal with this so that any portupgrades, > > etc. won't keep trampling over my nvidia GL libraries. I was > > going to use an ALT_PKGDEP for portupgrade, but the problem is > > that libGL also installs some include files that nvidia-driver > > does not, so that's not a sufficient solution. > > Maybe it would be helpful to add libGL as a dependency to > the nvidia-driver port. That means, when the libGL port > is updated, the nvidia-driver port will be rebuilt, too, > because it depends on the libGL port, which means that > the nvidia-driver's library will always override the one > installed by the libGL port. > > Best regards > Oliver Excellent idea! Hadn't thought of that. That also obviates the need for a new "AFFECTS" variable in ports that was discussed recently by myself and a few others. I'll Cc: this on to the nvidia-driver maintainer. Thanks, Conrad -- Conrad J. Sabatier conr...@cox.net _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
