On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Matthew Seaman <m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk> wrote: > The important bit was that it could be fixed without bumping port epoch > by making the port version come out to 2.3.1a -- that missing dot makes > all the difference.
i don't think that's an allowed PORTVERSION value -- Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer <avi...@freebsd.org> http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
