I just submitted ports/162178 (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=162178), it adds a bsd.clang.mk that allows port maintainers and users to tune the use of Clang/LLVM with the ports tree.
Maintainers can: - Mark ports as CLANG_SAFE - Mark ports as CLANG_UNSAFE - Use CLANG_PREFERRED (if available, clang will be used instead of cc) - Use USE_CLANG (like CLANG_PREFERRED, but introduces a build dependency if clang originates from the ports tree) Users can: - PREFER_CLANG, which takes effect if a port is CLANG_SAFE - FORCE_CLANG, which takes effect unless a port is CLANG_UNSAFE Obviously this needs testers. The maintainer side is more complex, because you can do things like defining CLANG_UNSAFE=2.9- and CLANG_SAFE=3. It's also possible to define version ranges like USE_CLANG=2.9-3 or specify several ranges like CLANG_UNSAFE= 2.9- 3.4+. -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
