On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 06:08:44PM +0800, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > Ahh. I see the issue. I have not looked at bsd.gcc.mk, but it does > > not seem like this should be too difficult. Just a matter of the > > right person having the time. Would ports specifying gcc46 need to > > be touched? > > Nope. All transparent. USE_GCC=4.6+ or USE_FORTRAN=yes both will > automagically just pull in lang/gcc instead of lang/gcc46 by default. > > That's the plan. It's taken a bit longer than I had hoped (for a > number of reasons), but we are nearly there. ;-) > > Gerald
Hi Gerald, Thanks for the explanation. Regarding of gcc in tinderbox, how can I tell tinderbox to use lang/gcc instead of a weekly-update lang/gcc46 when it encounters USE_GCC=4.6? Regards, -- Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh <sunpoet at sunpoet.net> <sunpoet at FreeBSD.org> 4096R/CC57E36B 8AD8 68F2 7D2B 0A10 7E9B 8CC0 DC44 247E CC57 E36B http://people.FreeBSD.org/~sunpoet/pgpkeys.txt _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"