On 02/08/12 01:48, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 02/07/2012 17:43, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>> if a certain port needs to be kept in sync with another portversion,
>> other than putting a comment in the main port "# must bump portversion
>> in port..." where you have two maintainers, is there a better way to do
>> this?
> 
> Take a look at editors/xxe and editors/xml2rfc-xxe

devel/py-subversion might be a better example since it includes
Makefile.common specifically from subversion.


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70  3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C
Philip M. Gollucci (pgollu...@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354
Member,                           Apache Software Foundation
Committer,                        FreeBSD Foundation
Consultant,                       P6M7G8 Inc.
Director Operations,              Ridecharge Inc.

Work like you don't need the money,
love like you'll never get hurt,
and dance like nobody's watching.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to