I've got a 10-CURRENT build in my tinderbox. I'll kick off building it and everything that depends on it there, on both 10-CURRENT and 7.x, 8.x and 9.x. I think exp-run is overkill for something non-infrastructure like this. Assuming no build breakage, I'd say it's fine to commit.
Steve > Tested on 8.2, and 9.0, tinderbox logs fine (you will notice scons tries > to delete an extra egg... I will that, but that is a different pr) > > submitter has 10.0, maintainer has 8.2. > > Can I get some testing on 10.0 for this? pr has specific code looking > for 10.x: > > +#if __FreeBSD_version>= 1000005 > ++ if (checkpath(dir, mntpath) != 0) > ++ err(1, "%s", mntpath); > ++#else > + (void)checkpath(dir, mntpath); > ++#endif > > > pr is http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/164218 > > patch (with portsrevision added): > > http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell/pr_164218_sysutils_fusefs-kmod.patch > -- > Michael Scheidell, CTO > o: 561-999-5000 > d: 561-948-2259 > >*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation > > * Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011 > * Best Intrusion Prevention Product > * Hot Company Finalist 2011 > * Best Email Security Product > * Certified SNORT Integrator > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"