On 4/5/12 4:04 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 3/30/12 4:35 PM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
o When pkg-plist changes (except for fixing
.ifdef/NOPORT(DOCS|EXAMPLES))
#1 covers this, this is the OPTIONS case (default vs not)
perfect example, real world.
And, in exactly this situation, I have submitted several pr's without
portrevision bumps, and they have all been committed like that. no
portrevision bump.
(did I mention I didn't commit them? other, more senior members of
the port team, who were the maintainers did?)
Also, there is this one: waiting for maintainer timeout,
<http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/165820>
on pointyhat, package won't change, since pointyhat does not define
NOPORT(DOCS|EXAMPLES), so, package does not change.
So, for all conditions:
ie: we do/don't want pointyhat to rebuild pkg... this would be a noop.
if we do/don't think the OP would want to rebuild pkg.. if they
don't assign NOPORT*, then its a noop. (and if they are concerned, can
rm the files.)
and, no, pav is wrong ;-)
you don't want to have your port do a rm -rf /usr/local/share.
At least two ports that I know of put critical files in there, and, if
you do that, the portupgrade/portmaster/make delinstall will squeal to
the next system OP that there is something bad wrong, because pkg-plist
is wrong, and it can't delete files, can't em dirs, and did not delete
the package.
anyone important want to commit this pr?
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/165820
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
