On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 21:16:04 +0200 Mel Flynn <rfl...@acsalaska.net> wrote:
> On 9-6-2012 14:02, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > On 09/06/2012 12:25, Christopher J. Ruwe wrote: > >> Thanks for your quick answer. Incidentally, I am at this moment > >> also preparing a maintainer update for a new version of math/ess. > >> Should I perpare two PRs, one for the CONFLICTS and one for the > >> actual update or is it permissable to pack these two into one? > > > > It is best to put all the changes you want to make into one PR. > > That will get it processed most efficiently. > > And if there's a PR for the conflict problem, then mention in your > update PR that this update "closes PR xxxxxx". > Thanks for reminding me, I would surely have forgotten. However, closing another PR does not apply, I was approached using private mail by a group apparently implementing something like a FreeBSD ports conflicts checker, who are systematically combing the ports tree for conflicts not yet known by the maintainers. Some maintainer update PRs already adress problems thus found. Thanks, cheers, -- Christopher J. Ruwe TZ: GMT + 1h
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
