> > Then, from UPDATING file, I could do either > > portmaster p5-
> I specifically recommend not doing that, as you'll end up with stuff > that's mixed between the old and new versions, which can cause problems. > > Maybe I could combine these as > > portmaster -r png- -r perl- > > Would that work right? > Reading the man page can answer that question for you. :) > Doug Yes, I read the man page many times, not only portmaster and pkg_info but also csh (which is the same as man tcsh) and sh, looking for "for" command. In tcsh, I found "foreach" but not "for", but found "for" command in sh. My worry is rebuilding hplip, gnash, swfdec, seamonkey, xorg-server and some other big ports twice each. I have Sandy Bridge system and want to try the new xorg-server with KMS. I hope "portmaster -r png- -r perl-" wouldn't rebuild ports with png- and then again with perl- . FreeBSD users tend to trust UPDATING file, so if "portmaster p5-" doesn't work well, it ought to be corrected. Tom _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
