Hi Joseph, On Wed, 1 Aug 2012 18:21:38 -0300, Joseph Mingrone <j...@ftfl.ca> said: > Hello again Ashish;
> I played around with the port options and it does indeed look like > dbus/gconf/gtk were being installed because they were "indirect > dependencies". For example, with these options selected (shown > below) the run dependencies were limited to > % make run-depends-list > /usr/ports/devel/pkgconf > /usr/ports/graphics/jpeg > /usr/ports/graphics/png > /usr/ports/graphics/tiff > /usr/ports/print/freetype2 > /usr/ports/print/libotf > /usr/ports/security/gnutls > /usr/ports/textproc/libxml2 > /usr/ports/x11-fonts/libXft > /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/libXaw > /usr/ports/x11/libXpm. Weird. Do you've any idea from where devel/libgsf was getting included in dependencies list? > The list no longer contains devel/libgsf, which pulls in > dbus/gconf/gtk. I was confused when I turned off options like dbus > and saw that it was still getting installed. > Thanks for enduring all my emails and thanks for the hard work > involved with updating the port. No problems. Ports are updated now. Let me know if you see any issues. Thanks -- Ashish SHUKLA | GPG: F682 CDCC 39DC 0FEA E116 20B6 C746 CFA9 E74F A4B0 Sent from my Emacs _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"