Reply from maintainer. On 10 Aug 2012 11:12, "Thomas Sander" <thomas.san...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hello, > > It has no reason why the version is so old. You can submit a PR. > > B.R. > Thomas > > 2012/8/10 Chris Rees <utis...@gmail.com> > >> Copying in maintainer. >> On 10 Aug 2012 10:42, "HU Dong" <itechb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> kdbg has been upgraded to 2.5.1 with qt4 library, while the port >>> devel/kdbg is still 2.2.0 with qt3 library. I modified the port a >>> little and had it successfully built. Is there any reason that it >>> should stay with the older version? If not, I'll submit a PR. >>> >>> B.R. >>> HU Dong >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" >>> >>> > _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
