On 08/10/2012 09:35 PM, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote: [..] >>>>> On 08/01/2012 05:09, Oliver Pinter wrote: >>>>>> I found this today on FD: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2012/Aug/4 [..] > Eh, why wouldn't a CVE name not be assigned? If none is we should ask > MITRE to assign one, but it would surprise me if NVIDIA or a Linux > vendor hasn't done this already.
This is from oss-security: -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [oss-security] CVE Request: NVidia Linux driver Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 18:46:34 -0400 (EDT) From: cve-ass...@mitre.org Reply-To: oss-secur...@lists.openwall.com To: marc.deslauri...@canonical.com CC: cve-ass...@mitre.org, oss-secur...@lists.openwall.com, secur...@ubuntu.com > http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2012/Aug/4 > http://nvidia.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/3140 Use CVE-2012-4225. -- CVE assignment team, MITRE CVE Numbering Authority M/S M300 202 Burlington Road, Bedford, MA 01730 USA [ PGP key available through http://cve.mitre.org/cve/request_id.html ] _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
