On 08/29/2012 09:46 AM, G. Paul Ziemba wrote: > I think my original reply did not go out on 8/27, so here it is:
I didn't see it, so thanks for the resend. > One thing I did notice was that in the failed scenario (described > in my previous message), the tmp file named /tmp/<foo>DI-FILES<bar> > was incomplete, but in the run today with -D, the corresponding > tmp file was much larger (48851 bytes) and had a lot more ports listed. > No idea if that's significant. Yes, it is, and it confirms what I suspected the problem is. I will need some time to address this, I'll try to get a patch out by the end of this weekend. Doug _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
