On Sunday, 10 March 2013 00:37:15 poyop...@puripuri.plala.or.jp wrote: > Hi, good work, David.
Hi Kuro > It compiles, packages and works flawlessly here for replacement of 1.9 > so far for a week. Great, thanks. Good to know :-) > On my compile box, amd64/Athlon64 5050e 2.6GHz 2 core/8GB, > memory requirement for translation processes is far less than > warning shown. It prevents build with > > | warn: this system has insufficient memory, expected at least 9227MiB RAM > > however my translation processes under -DPYPY_IGNORE_MEMORY take 2GB > for normal binary and 2.5GB for sandboxed one so they aggregate 4.5GB > to run parallel. This is good news. Could you please detail how you measured peak memory? I might need to retest the port. > This is far less than "expected", no page thrashing, > no hang, no stuttering. It does not matter being with pypy1.9 or pypy2.0 > (yes, I built twice for 2.0 self hosting. Not tried with cPython.) > > So I think this warning is a bit excessive that makes everyone just put > PYPY_IGNORE_MEMORY=1 in their make.conf. Just in my case. I'll disable the test for now and revise my estimation. Thanks for reporting back. Regards
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.