On 28 April 2013 12:25, Palle Girgensohn <gir...@pingpong.net> wrote: > 28 apr 2013 kl. 10:37 skrev Chris Rees <cr...@freebsd.org>: > >> Please CC maintainers when you're asking about specific ports! >> On 28 April 2013 07:05, Scot Hetzel <swhet...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Florent Peterschmitt < >>> flor...@peterschmitt.fr> wrote: >>> >>>> Le 27/04/2013 23:13, Matthew Seaman a écrit : >>>>> On 27/04/2013 19:49, Florent Peterschmitt wrote: >>>>>> Hello, >>>>>> >>>>>> I use the latest poudriere-devel to make my own pkg repository, and >>>>>> would like to build postgresql with LDAP support. >>>>>> >>>>>> Since it's in a virgin jail, and because the log said « hey I need >>>>>> ldap.h », I understand that openldap should be installed but, is it the >>>>>> good way to do ? For each package requirement, it is needed to install >>>>>> it by hand ? (or with previously built packages :) ) >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You should use the 'poudriere options' command to enable LDAP support in >>>>> the postgresql server. >>>> >>>> Yep, I did that. Sorry, I missed to say I already have done this. The >>>> problem is that when building the package, the configure step fail >>>> saying ldap.h is missing. >>>> >>>>> Now, when you use poudriere to build the postgresql package, it will >>>>> have LDAP client added as a requirement -- so poudriere will also build >>>>> you an LDAP package -- and when you go to install postgresql, ldap will >>>>> be installed as well as a dependency. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> >>>>> Matthew >>>>> >>>> Yep. But how does work poudriere ? Because I have built postfix and >>>> dovecot2 with LDAP support and there was no problem. I think it's a >>>> problem from the port itself and not from poudriere, I should try in a >>>> new system (perhaps, a jail, without poudriere). >>>> >>> >>> The problem seems to be caused by the following from >>> databases/postgresql91-server/Makefile: >>> >>> 66 .if !defined(CLIENT_ONLY) && !defined(SLAVE_ONLY) >>> 67 SERVER_ONLY= yes >>> 68 USE_RC_SUBR= postgresql >>> 69 USE_PGSQL= yes >>> 70 WANT_PGSQL_VER= >>> ${DISTVERSION:C/([0-9][0-9]*)\.([0-9][0-9]*).*/\1\2/g} >>> 71 USERS= ${PG_USER} >>> 72 GROUPS= ${PG_GROUP} >>> 73 SUB_FILES+= 502.pgsql >>> 74 .endif >>> >>> 81 .if !defined(SLAVE_ONLY) >>> 82 OPTIONS_DEFINE+= NLS DTRACE PAM LDAP GSSAPI OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS XML >>> TZDATA DEBUG KRB5 >>> 83 OPTIONS_SINGLE= KRB5 >>> 84 OPTIONS_SINGLE_KRB5= MIT_KRB5 HEIMDAL_KRB5 >>> : >>> 112 OPTIONS_DEFAULT= NLS XML TZDATA INTDATE SSL >>> 113 .endif # !SLAVE_ONLY >>> >>> 159 . if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MLDAP} >>> 160 CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--with-ldap >>> 161 . if defined (SERVER_ONLY) >>> 162 USE_OPENLDAP= yes >>> 163 . endif >>> 164 . endif >>> >>> NOTE: postgresql90-client/Makefile includes postgresql90-server/Makefile >>> which then includes postgresql91-server/Makefile >>> >>> Unfortunately, you can't set USE_OPENLDAP as a build depends. Try >>> commenting out lines 161 and 163 in the postgresql91-server/Makefile. This >>> will add OpenLDAP as a LIB_DEPENDS to the postgresql*-client ports. >>> >> >> Actually, >> >> [crees@medusa]~% psql >> Shared object "libldap_r-2.4.so.8" not found, required by "libpq.so.5" >> [crees@medusa]~% >> >> LDAP is indeed a LIB_DEPENDS. >> >> Palle, Jason, if you don't object I'm going to add || defined >> (CLIENT_ONLY) to line 161 above. >> >> Chris > > It seems strange to me that psql should require libldap? That seems like a > bug, or am I missing something? Why would the client side of the connection > need to use ldap?
I'm not sure, it may be a question for upstream. I'll ask the guys in IRC if they know. Chris _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"