Hi, It seems like in that case I can get rid off the GCC versions of 10-CURRENT. Going through redports I can see that they don't run GCC/CLANG for HEAD except 9.
dim, Yeap I will keep it for both in 9-RELEASE. Everybody has, it's upto you that how far you wanna go. :P. I can see that still my resources are 75% free. Regards, Muhammad On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 2:38 AM, Dimitry Andric <[email protected]> wrote: > On May 8, 2013, at 22:22, Muhammad Moinur Rahman <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Currently I have got 10 builds in my Tinderbox. These are following : > > 10-CURRENT/amd64 w/clang (-r249422) > > 10-CURRENT/amd64 w/gcc (-r249422) > > 10-CURRENT/i386 w/clang (-r249422) > > 10-CURRENT/i386 w/gcc (-r249422) > > 8-STABLE/amd64 8.3 > > 8-STABLE/i386 8.3 > > 9-STABLE/amd64 w/clang 9.1 > > 9-STABLE/amd64 w/gcc 9.1 > > 9-STABLE/i386 w/clang 9.1 > > 9-STABLE/i386 w/gcc 9.1 > > > > As per my understanding I think I am overkilling with the GCC versions as > > for 9.1 and 10-CURRENT as for 9.1 and 10-CURRENT at -r249422 the default > > compiler is CLANG. Am I correct or wrong? > > > Clang is only the default compiler on 10-CURRENT. It will most likely > never be the default on 9.x. > > That said, tinderboxing with both compilers is very nice, because > sometimes a change can work just fine with the default compiler, but not > with the other. Not everybody has the resources to compile that much > variants... :-) > > -Dimitry > > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
