Le 14/06/2013 10:12, Thomas Mueller a écrit : > I see in the $PORTSDIR/UPDATING file that perl has been updated. > > perl5.16 has been updated from 5.16.2 to 5.16.3 . > > Since this is only (?) a minor-version update, why should it be necessary to > upgrade all ports that depend on perl? > > portmaster -r perl > > In that case, why didn't they go to perl 5.18? > > Since so many ports depend on perl, and png too, maybe they should have > updated perl and png (to 1.6.x) at the same time, then two massive portmaster > or portupgrade runs could have been done together, as one even bigger > portmaster or portupgrade run? > > > Tom
If you don't want to rebuild *really* everything depending on perl, you can first give a shot en perl modules: pkg info | sed -rn 's/^(p5.*)-[0-9]+.*/\1/p' | xargs portmaster Maybe this can be done using only pkg query but I'm too lazy for the moment 8-} But you should know that it can make other perl dependent ports not working anymore. -- Florent Peterschmitt | Please: flor...@peterschmitt.fr | * Avoid HTML/RTF in E-mail. +33 (0)6 64 33 97 92 | * Send PDF for documents. http://florent.peterschmitt.fr | Thank you :)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
