You don't understand. devel/imake is a fine piece of software but people do not want to install more software than they have to. net/vnc comes with it's own integrated Xserver. Using this logic we should integrate x11-servers/xorg into it too. Neither makes sense. The only reason to use devel/imake is if net/vnc _installs_ its own imake, which it does not. There's no reason to install more software just to build other software if we don't need it. It's extra baggage.
I'll put net/vnc on my list of 10-exp builds that need fixing. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert <cy.schub...@komquats.com> FreeBSD UNIX: <c...@freebsd.org> Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org In message <20130619132325.gb30...@sh4-5.1blu.de>, Matthias Apitz writes: > El día Wednesday, June 19, 2013 a las 06:18:58AM -0700, Cy Schubert escribió: > > > There are quite a few ports which have issues using the new toolchain in > > 10. Dragging in imake in ports and the rest of X would be overkill too. > > I'll put this on my todo list for 10. > > Hi Cy. > > The port devel/imake is already fine, i.e. the installed imake works > fine; the problem here is that the vnc port tries to make its own > version of 'imake' in its own source tree. > > matthias > -- > Matthias Apitz | /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: www.asciiribbon.or > g > E-mail: g...@unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail > WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X - No proprietary attachments > phone: +49-170-4527211 | / \ - Respect for open standards > _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"