On Wed, 03 Jul 2013 14:15:02 -0500 "Mark Felder" <f...@feld.me> wrote:
> Hi all, > > I'm hoping someone reading this list is a Dovecot2 user that can spend a > few minutes testing a patch to the pigeonhole port. > > Basically, there's a conflict between mail/dovecot2 and > mail/dovecot2-pigeonhole that breaks the ability to use pkgng with those > ports. What I need from you is to test this patch and let me know if you > experience any problems with utilizing pigeonhole (sieve). It should be an > instantaneous result: either it works and lets you make changes, or it > doesn't. My brief testing proved that it binds to the correct port and > responds, but I don't have a proper test environment to go further. > > The main difference is that the dovecot2-pigeonhole port could now be > installed in a PREFIX if needed and its docs and headers are in their own > directories: %%PREFIX%%/share/doc/dovecot-pigeonhole/ and > %%PREFIX%%/lib/dovecot-2.2-pigeonhole/sieve/ > > The attached is an svn diff. Your feedback would be much appreciated. > > > Thanks Sorry for the delay, I had forgot my test about it : So far, sounds good to me, it build and installed without any messages, I'll let this version run on my server and report here if there is any problems. Thanks for your work! -- Matthieu Volat
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
