Sorry, should be fixed already. Thanks for raising the flag. -Max On Aug 16, 2013 10:03 PM, "Matthew D. Fuller" <fulle...@over-yonder.net> wrote:
> Hey guys, > > Since databases/rrdmerge showed up in ports, portupgrade seems to have > gotten a bit unhappy with INDEX: > > [Updating the portsdb <format:bdb_btree> [...] > /usr/ports/INDEX-8:19441:rrdmerge-0.0_b05d69bfac64: 0.0_b05d69bfac64: Not > in due form: '<version>[_<revision>][,<epoch>]'. > > (whether the version is itself malformed, or portsdb is being overly > retentive, I leave as an exercise to the readers ;) > > > -- > Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fulle...@over-yonder.net > Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ > On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream. > > _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"