On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 07:22:35AM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 10/03/2013 04:54 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 10:58:56AM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > >> > >> Baptiste Daroussin ha scritto: > >>> Here you are: > >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2013-October/086346.html > >> > >> > >>> > I > >>> > >> was referring the the previous one: "[HEADSUP] Stage support for > >> the ports tree". Dunno if it had additional info or this second > >> one is enough. > >> > > I mixed both in one :) > > I do appreciate the explanations very much. > > I am having a problem with a port in which if NO_STAGE is not set, > then the build part of the process fails. As far as I can tell, > staging should not effect the build part of the process in any way. > So two questions: > 1. If I set NO_STAGE=yes in that port, is this going to be a big > problem? It will have to be a work around until I can get the next > question answered: > 2. Any ideas on why staging would effect the build process? The port > includes subpackages that use "./configure; make; make install" and > are supposed to install into $WRKSRC/local, but instead sometimes > installs into $WRKDIR/stage/portname/work/pkgname/local. > > Thanks, Stephen
Which port is that? Maybe I can help? regards, Bapt
pgpEByFlhRTSB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
