On 2/8/2014 11:26, Matthias Andree wrote: > Individual examples aside, I recollect that one of the selling points > for STAGING, together with pkgNG, was that we would later have the > chance to split up one build into multiple binary packages. > > Not sure what other changes to the infrastructure are required > (Mk/bsd.port.mk needs to be taught to build more than one package from > the STAGEDIR), but it's not impossible that we'll see features as Lev > desires, later, as "perhaps in 2015". > > And libgcc_s is a dependency you get on practically every port that is > compiled with a newer GCC.
Are you sure this is still true? Now that FreeBSD supports dl_iterate_phdr (and has for a few years now), gcc exceptions are handled through rtld, not libgcc_s. I suspect that newer FreeBSD releases have packages without this linked library. Is there another reason to see libgcc_s used these days? John _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
