On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Geoff Speicher <ge...@sea-incorporated.com>wrote:
> Actually, I have a question about ports/184327. This bug report asserts > that ansidecl.h is an internal file necessary only to build the GNU > toolchain and should not be installed by devel/binutils. However, binutils > also installs bfd.h which happens to include ansidecl.h (at least, it does > in v2.24). Therefore, the installed bfd.h is broken. This fact either > contradicts the original assertion that ansidecl.h should not be installed, > or else it implies that bfd.h should not be installed either. > There was a third possibility that I had overlooked, and appears to be a decent compromise: bfd.h doesn't actually need to directly include ansidecl.h for anything that I can see, so if we patch the port to remove the include directive then bfd.h is no longer broken and ports/184327 is also satisfied. Any objections to this? _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"