Hi po...@freebsd.org
While making my standard collection of ports on 8.4-RELEASE
(yes I also have 9.2 & 10 on other partitions on some but not all hosts)
I saw numerous examples similar to:
cd /usr/ports/multimedia/ogmrip ; make
===> ogmrip-1.0.0 depends on executable: mencoder - found
===> ogmrip-1.0.0 depends on executable: mplayer - found
===> ogmrip-1.0.0 depends on executable: gsed - not found
===> Verifying install for gsed in /usr/ports/textproc/gsed
===> Returning to build of ogmrip-1.0.0
... & a later fail with eg gsed not found
(why not found I'm not sure, as I started with a new empty /usr/local/
but why is irrelevant, it should recover)
(in this case, a manual make in
/pri/FreeBSD/branches/-current/ports/textproc/gsed
solved it, but that's an exception to the general case,
& also irrelevant)
Wouldn't it be better if we had a make reinstall in dependency
(eg textproc/gsed) not just
a make install which presumably just looks at dependency
textproc/gsed/work/.install_done.sed._usr_local &
doesnt try to install the binary we already know IS missing.
I'm not clear how to do reinstall instead of install via Mk/ ?
But it's somewhere around here:
vi -c'/^_INSTALL_DEPENDS=' /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk
Called from ${_INSTALL_DEPENDS} in fragment:
if [ $$notfound != 0 ]; then \
${ECHO_MSG} "===> Verifying $$target for $$prog in
$$dir"; \
if [ ! -d "$$dir" ]; then \
${ECHO_MSG} " => No directory for $$prog.
Skipping.."; \
else \
${_INSTALL_DEPENDS} \
fi; \
Cheers,
Julian
--
Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix'78 C Sys Eng Consultant Munich http://berklix.com
Interleave reply paragraphs like a play script.
http://berklix.eu/pirates/ - A daft name but good ideas, read before voting.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
