On Sun, 8 Jun 2014, Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On June 8, 2014 at 10:32:33 AM -0600 Warren Block <wbl...@wonkity.com>
wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2014, Paul Schmehl wrote:
Yes, I do have a few ports with none-default options. The problem is,
they're critical ports (like apache22).
At present, these have to be built from ports. Long-term, there is a
plan to have multiple packages for ports with options.
It seems like a completely unworkable solution to me. For example, say you
have a port with 10 options. Imagine how many different binaries you would
have to have to cover every possible combination of selected options. It
would take a huge amount of storage
I can't say how it will work, just pointing out that until variant
packages are available, ports with default options that aren't as
desired still have to be built locally.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
