On 2 July 2014 17:39, Dylan Leigh <f...@dylanleigh.net> wrote: > Is there any policy on keeping ports where upstream is not > maintained and the software itself is depreciated (except to > open and export old files)? Do we still want to keep such a port > in the active tree?
It is fine to maintain unchanged upstream ports provided they have an active downstream maintainer. The only concern is patches: the ports tree must not become a repo by which the upstream port is continued to be developed. If you just want to make sure that the port remains "available" this is perfectly fine. -- Eitan Adler _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
