W dniu 2014-08-13 o 11:45, Karl Pielorz pisze: > We have a number of 10.x systems now - where we install packages (aka > pkg install) some components, but other components we build from ports > (as we need to add / remove options that the package gives you no choice > over). > > Initially 'pkg upgrade' wanted to replace the port versions with pkg > versions (which include options we don't want, and would have pulled in > a lot of other dependencies). > > I seem to have fixed this by 'locking' them (i.e. pkg lock) - pkg > upgrade doesn't want to touch them now, which is good. > > But, 'pkg upgrade' still wants to pull in more packages than are > installed - i.e. 'pkg upgrade' shows entries under "to be INSTALLED" as > well as "to be UPGRADED". > > 'pkg info -a -d' displays the dependencies of all installed packages > (none of which depend on the package it wants to install) - but I can't > seem to find any way to get 'pkg upgrade' to tell me why it wants to > install a new package (i.e. which *upgrade* is it doing that now > requires the "to be INSTALLED" packages?)
You could solve this by using your own poudriere - create repos with your own port's options and pkg upgrade everything. Your current approach - mixing packages and ports - is not supported IIRC. -- best regards, Lukasz Wasikowski _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
