Le 23/09/2014 11:02, Michelle Sullivan a écrit : > Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> [...] >> You are using portupgrade so first upgrade pkg with portupgrade >> >> > > Just a thought here - why (like .rpm and .deb - and the reason I hate > them so much) are you making the package manager version a dependency of > a package? I can understand if there are new features that you may need > to use a later version to get those features, but making a package > dependent on the package manager rather than displaying a warning that a > feature is missing is the brain dead way that plagues upgrades for > redhat and debian. Of course if your intent is to make FreeBSD into > another Linux distro just with a different kernel, continue. >
What is the problem of upgrading the package manager first and then upgrade the rest of the world without any problem?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
