Basic context:

> # dmesg | head
> ...
> FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #0 r279514M: Wed Mar 18 20:11:15 PDT 2015
>     root@FBSDG5C0:/usr/obj/usr/srcC/sys/GENERIC64vtsc-NODEBUG powerpc
> gcc version 4.9.1 (FreeBSD Ports Collection for powerpc64) 
> ...

> # freebsd-version -ku; uname -apKU
> 11.0-CURRENT
> 11.0-CURRENT
> FreeBSD FBSDG5C0 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #0 r279514M: Wed Mar 18 
> 20:11:15 PDT 2015     
> root@FBSDG5C0:/usr/obj/usr/srcC/sys/GENERIC64vtsc-NODEBUG  powerpc powerpc64 
> 1100062 1100062


> make -j 8 CROSS_TOOLCHAIN=powerpc64-gcc \
> WITHOUT_CLANG_BOOTSTRAP= WITH_CLANG= WITH_CLANG_IS_CC= \
> WITH_LLDB= \
> WITH_GCC_BOOTSTRAP= WITH_GCC= WITHOUT_GNUCXX= \
> WITHOUT_BOOT= WITHOUT_LIB32= \
> buildworld buildkernel \
> KERNCONF=GENERIC64vtsc-NODEBUG \
> TARGET=powerpc TARGET_ARCH=powerpc64

For the context set by:

> # more /etc/src.conf
> CC=/usr/local/bin/powerpc64-portbld-freebsd11.0-gcc
> CXX=/usr/local/bin/powerpc64-portbld-freebsd11.0-g++
> CPP=/usr/local/bin/powerpc64-portbld-freebsd11.0-cpp
> CROSS_BINUTILS_PREFIX=/usr/local/powerpc64-freebsd/bin/
> X_COMPILER_TYPE=gcc
> WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS=
> #
> # CXXFLAGS For buildworld/buildkernel CROSS_TOOLCHAIN=powerpc64-gcc use...
> # spans being-built and (failing finding those directories) live and so for
> # -DNO_CLEAN after being-built ones are in place depends on self-hodsting
> # where the two are sufficient compatibile.
> #
> # I've used .../. paths so I can tell use of these from other sources of 
> paths.
> #
> # Actually only appropriate for for _includes _libraries _depend everything 
> build32 :
> CXXFLAGS+=-I/usr/obj/usr/srcC/tmp/usr/include/c++/v1/. -std=gnu++11 
> -L/usr/obj/usr/srcC/lib/libc++/.
> #
> # Actually only appropriate for for _worldtmp _legacy _bootstrap-tools 
> _cleanobj _obj _build-tools _cross-tools :
> CXXFLAGS+=-I/usr/include/c++/v1/. -std=gnu++11 -L/usr/lib/.
> #
> # But for self-hosting in a cross tools like manor sometimes having both can 
> work.
> #
> NO_WERROR=




The problem:

(Somewhat reformatted text...)

> In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/./algorithm:625:0,
>                  from 
> /usr/srcC/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/StringRef.h:13,
>                  from 
> /usr/srcC/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/StringMap.h:17,
>                  from 
> /usr/srcC/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/include/llvm/Support/SpecialCaseList.h:51,
>                  from 
> /usr/srcC/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/lib/Support/SpecialCaseList.cpp:17:
> /usr/include/c++/v1/./type_traits:
> 
> In instantiation of 'struct std::__1::__is_convertible<const 
> llvm::StringMap<llvm::SpecialCaseList::Entry>&, 
> llvm::StringMap<llvm::SpecialCaseList::Entry>, 0u, 0u>':
> /usr/include/c++/v1/./type_traits:943:62:
> required from
> 
> 'struct std::__1::is_convertible<const 
> llvm::StringMap<llvm::SpecialCaseList::Entry>&, 
> llvm::StringMap<llvm::SpecialCaseList::Entry> >'
> /usr/include/c++/v1/./utility:269:77:
> required by
> 
> substitution of 'template<class _U1, class _U2> std::__1::pair<_T1, 
> _T2>::pair(const std::__1::pair<_U1, _U2>&, typename 
> std::__1::enable_if<(std::__1::is_convertible<const _U1&, _T1>::value && 
> std::__1::is_convertible<const _U2&, _T2>::value)>::type*) [with _U1 = 
> llvm::StringRef; _U2 = llvm::StringMap<llvm::SpecialCaseList::Entry>]'
> /usr/srcC/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/StringMap.h:371:55:
> required from
> 
> 'llvm::StringMap<ValueTy, AllocatorTy>::MapEntryTy& llvm::StringMap<ValueTy, 
> AllocatorTy>::GetOrCreateValue(llvm::StringRef, InitTy) [with InitTy = 
> llvm::StringMap<llvm::SpecialCaseList::Entry>; ValueTy = 
> llvm::StringMap<llvm::SpecialCaseList::Entry>; AllocatorTy = 
> llvm::MallocAllocator; llvm::StringMap<ValueTy, AllocatorTy>::MapEntryTy = 
> llvm::StringMapEntry<llvm::StringMap<llvm::SpecialCaseList::Entry> >]'
> /usr/srcC/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/StringMap.h:375:43:
> required from
> 
> 'llvm::StringMap<ValueTy, AllocatorTy>::MapEntryTy& llvm::StringMap<ValueTy, 
> AllocatorTy>::GetOrCreateValue(llvm::StringRef) [with ValueTy = 
> llvm::StringMap<llvm::SpecialCaseList::Entry>; AllocatorTy = 
> llvm::MallocAllocator; llvm::StringMap<ValueTy, AllocatorTy>::MapEntryTy = 
> llvm::StringMapEntry<llvm::StringMap<llvm::SpecialCaseList::Entry> >]'
> /usr/srcC/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/StringMap.h:299:32:
> required from
> 
> 'ValueTy& llvm::StringMap<ValueTy, AllocatorTy>::operator[](llvm::StringRef) 
> [with ValueTy = llvm::StringMap<llvm::SpecialCaseList::Entry>; AllocatorTy = 
> llvm::MallocAllocator]'
> /usr/srcC/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/lib/Support/SpecialCaseList.cpp:120:21:
> required from
> 
> here
> /usr/include/c++/v1/./type_traits:881:87: error: use of deleted function 
> 'llvm::StringMap<llvm::SpecialCaseList::Entry>::StringMap(const 
> llvm::StringMap<llvm::SpecialCaseList::Entry>&)'
>          
> sizeof(__is_convertible_imp::__test<_T2>(__is_convertible_imp::__source<_T1>()))
>  == 1
>                                                                               
>          ^

and a little more...

> In file included from 
> /usr/srcC/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/include/llvm/Support/SpecialCaseList.h:51:0,
>                  from 
> /usr/srcC/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/lib/Support/SpecialCaseList.cpp:17:
> /usr/srcC/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/StringMap.h:226:7:
> note: 'llvm::StringMap<llvm::SpecialCaseList::Entry>::StringMap(const 
> llvm::StringMap<llvm::SpecialCaseList::Entry>&)' is implicitly declared as 
> deleted because 'llvm::StringMap<llvm::SpecialCaseList::Entry>' declares a 
> move constructor or move assignment operator
>  class StringMap : public StringMapImpl {
>        ^

where...

> namespace __is_convertible_imp
> {
> template <class _Tp> char  __test(_Tp);
> template <class _Tp> __two __test(...);
> #ifndef _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_RVALUE_REFERENCES
> template <class _Tp> _Tp&& __source();
> #else             
> template <class _Tp> typename remove_reference<_Tp>::type& __source();
> #endif
>     
> ...
> }

In other words:

> __is_convertible_imp::__source<const 
> llvm::StringMap<llvm::SpecialCaseList::Entry>&>()


is a function returning llvm::StringMap<llvm::SpecialCaseList::Entry>&& (an 
r-value reference, not a universal one). (I'm presuming rvalue references but 
the overall point is the same even for const 
llvm::StringMap<llvm::SpecialCaseList::Entry>& as the return type.)

As for __is_convertible_imp::__test:

> __is_convertible_imp::__test<llvm::StringMap<llvm::SpecialCaseList::Entry>>
>   (llvm::StringMap<llvm::SpecialCaseList::Entry>)

is a function returning a value of type char that is used when the argument can 
be passed into a llvm::StringMap<llvm::SpecialCaseList::Entry> type of 
parameter. Failure of this to be possible is not of itself an error 
("substitution failure is not an error" for selecting template functions): it 
just means that other example definitions of __is_convertible_imp::__test 
functions may be used to match the argument instead.

and

> __is_convertible_imp::__test<llvm::StringMap<llvm::SpecialCaseList::Entry>>(...)


is a function returning a value of type __two for all potential, valid argument 
lists. (_T2 is actually ignored.) When both __is_convertible_imp::__test's are 
non-errors the prior one is picked by the language rules: a better parameter 
vs. argument match.

Note that the status of deleted copy constructors can contribute to if

> __is_convertible_imp::__test<llvm::StringMap<llvm::SpecialCaseList::Entry>>
>   (llvm::StringMap<llvm::SpecialCaseList::Entry>)

is a match for the convertibility classifications and it is not an error for 
them to do so.

The size of the selected 
__is_convertible_imp::__test<llvm::StringMap<llvm::SpecialCaseList::Entry>>'s 
result type indicates the is-convertible status (sizeof(char) != sizeof(__two)) 
and the sizeof use means that overall the expression is a constexpr (compile 
time constant) that is based on the type analysis by the compiler, with no 
actual constructions happening.


But the powerpc64-gcc 4.9.1 compiler is not applying the principle of 
"substitution failure is not an error" and is not using the implicitly 
deleted-status to cause a mis-match for:

> __is_convertible_imp::__test<llvm::StringMap<llvm::SpecialCaseList::Entry>>
>   (llvm::StringMap<llvm::SpecialCaseList::Entry>)


So the compiler rejects the code for supposed use of an implicitly deleted 
StringMap(const StringMap &RHS) constructor. This is a wrong classification for 
the code.

It appears that powerpc64-gcc (gcc 4.9.1) is not up to compiling 11.0-CURRENT 
-r279514's clang/llvm as-is.





Context details, mostly applying to both gcc 4.2.1 based world/kernel with 
powperpc-gcc in use for cross compiling and gcc 4.9.1 based world/kernel:

powerpc64-gcc automatically looks in /usr/local/include for header files (like 
most such ports) and this can pick up the wrong file(s). I ended up renaming

/usr/local/include/iconv.h

so that it would not be found and used where a file with different content from 
my /usr/srcC/... was needed.


CROSS_TOOLCHAIN=powerpc64-gcc use does not allow -melf32ppc_fbsd for WITH_BOOT= 
and WITH_LIB32= build activity to use. Even if there was a 
powerpc-xtoolchain-gcc (and powerpc-gcc) around then selectively doing just the 
WITH_BOOT= and WITH_LIB32= would still not seem a natural fit.


In my experiments at times for the 4.9.1 based live-world I've placed the 
following symbolic links:

> # ls -FPal /usr/lib/libstdc*
> lrwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  8 Mar 19 03:47 /usr/lib/libstdc++.a@ -> libc++.a
> lrwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  9 Mar 19 03:47 /usr/lib/libstdc++.so@ -> libc++.so
> 
> # ls -FPal /usr/bin/gcc /usr/bin/g++
> lrwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  48 Mar 19 04:20 /usr/bin/g++@ -> 
> /usr/local/bin/powerpc64-portbld-freebsd11.0-g++
> lrwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  48 Mar 19 04:20 /usr/bin/gcc@ -> 
> /usr/local/bin/powerpc64-portbld-freebsd11.0-gcc

For example csu/powerpc64/... uses "gcc" directly, ignoring XCC and CC.

The CC, CXX, and CPP in...

> # more /etc/src.conf
> CC=/usr/local/bin/powerpc64-portbld-freebsd11.0-gcc
> CXX=/usr/local/bin/powerpc64-portbld-freebsd11.0-g++
> CPP=/usr/local/bin/powerpc64-portbld-freebsd11.0-cpp
> ...

that essentially duplicate the XCC, XCXX, XCPP assignments from 
CROSS_TOOLCHAIN=powerpc64-gcc are there because otherwise various stages do not 
use the cross tools (legacy, bootstrap-tools, build-tools, cross-tools, 
kernel-tools, lib32's build-tools). Originally I was investigating how far I 
could get without involving gcc 4.2.1 and what would be involved.

In the running world built-via-powerpc64-gcc environment /etc/src.conf having 
...

> # CXXFLAGS For buildworld/buildkernel CROSS_TOOLCHAIN=powerpc64-gcc use...
> CXXFLAGS+=-I/usr/obj/usr/srcC/tmp/usr/include/c++/v1/. -std=gnu+=11 
> -L/usr/obj/usr/srcC/lib/libc++/.

is used because otherwise (for example)...

> /usr/local/bin/powerpc64-portbld-freebsd11.0-g++ -fpic -DPIC  -O2 -pipe 
> -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/srcC/contrib/atf 
> -I/usr/srcC/lib/atf/libatf-c++/../libatf-c -I. -DHAVE_CONFIG_H 
> -fstack-protector -Wsyste
> m-headers -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wpointer-arith 
> -Wno-uninitialized   -c /usr/srcC/contrib/atf/atf-c++/detail/application.cpp 
> -o application.So

ends up with...

> In file included from 
> /usr/srcC/contrib/atf/atf-c++/detail/application.cpp:26:0:
> /usr/srcC/contrib/atf/atf-c++/detail/application.hpp:29:19: fatal error: 
> ostream: No such file or directory
> #include <ostream>
>                  ^
> compilation terminated.

from lack of -I/usr/obj/usr/srcC/tmp/usr/include/c++/v1/. in CXXFLAGS and the 
like. This is despite the /usr/srcC/Makefile.inc1 logic (that ends up 
inactive/ineffective for some reason):

> .if ${XCC:M/*}
> ...
> .if defined(X_COMPILER_TYPE) && ${X_COMPILER_TYPE} == gcc
> XCFLAGS+=       -isystem ${WORLDTMP}/usr/include -L${WORLDTMP}/usr/lib
> XCXXFLAGS+=     -I${WORLDTMP}/usr/include/c++/v1 -std=gnu++11 
> -L${WORLDTMP}/../lib/libc++
> DEPFLAGS+=      -I${WORLDTMP}/usr/include/c++/v1



As for /etc/make.conf it looks like...

> # more /etc/make.conf
> #CC=/usr/local/bin/powerpc64-portbld-freebsd11.0-gcc
> #CXX=/usr/local/bin/powerpc64-portbld-freebsd11.0-g++
> #CPP=/usr/local/bin/powerpc64-portbld-freebsd11.0-cpp
> #CROSS_BINUTILS_PREFIX=/usr/local/powerpc64-freebsd/bin/
> #X_COMPILER_TYPE=gcc
> # CXFLAGS For normal powerpc64-gcc use...
> # AVOID during the buildworld/buildkernel activities:
> #     _includes _libraries _depend everything build32.
> # See /etc/src.conf for example buildworld/buildkernel
> # values for that context.
> #CXXFLAGS+=-I/usr/include/c++/v1 -std=gnu++11 -L/usr/obj/usr/srcC/lib/libc++
> #
> #CC=/usr/local/bin/gcc5
> #CXX=/usr/local/bin/g++5
> #CPP=/usr/local/bin/cpp5
> #CC=/usr/local/bin/clang36
> #CXX=/usr/local/bin/clang++36
> #CPP=/usr/local/bin/clang-cpp36
> WRKDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj/portswork
> #WITH_DEBUG=
> MALLOC_PRODUCTION=

(Some of the comments show how gcc5/g++5 use was temporarily forced while 
rebuilding powerpc64-gcc from a booted world that had been built based on 
powerpc64-gcc in a gcc 4.2.1 world.)


> # svnlite info /usr/srcC/
> Path: /usr/srcC
> Working Copy Root Path: /usr/srcC
> URL: https://svn0.us-west.freebsd.org/base/head
> Relative URL: ^/head
> Repository Root: https://svn0.us-west.freebsd.org/base
> Repository UUID: ccf9f872-aa2e-dd11-9fc8-001c23d0bc1f
> Revision: 279514
> Node Kind: directory
> Schedule: normal
> Last Changed Author: adrian
> Last Changed Rev: 279514
> Last Changed Date: 2015-03-01 18:27:25 -0800 (Sun, 01 Mar 2015)

> # svnlite status /usr/srcC/ --no-ignore
> ?       /usr/srcC/.snap
> M       /usr/srcC/contrib/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/IntrusiveRefCntPtr.h
> ?       /usr/srcC/restoresymtable
> M       /usr/srcC/sys/ddb/db_main.c
> M       /usr/srcC/sys/ddb/db_script.c
> ?       /usr/srcC/sys/powerpc/conf/GENERIC64vtsc
> ?       /usr/srcC/sys/powerpc/conf/GENERIC64vtsc-NODEBUG
> ?       /usr/srcC/sys/powerpc/conf/GENERICvtsc
> ?       /usr/srcC/sys/powerpc/conf/GENERICvtsc-NODEBUG
> M       /usr/srcC/sys/powerpc/ofw/ofw_machdep.c
> M       /usr/srcC/sys/powerpc/ofw/ofwcall64.S

IntrusiveRefCntPtr.h does not matter if clang building is not involved. It 
needed a friend declaration to gain access to a private field, otherwise 
compilation stopped.

And the rest existed in my environment before I started this 
powerpc64-xtoolchain-gcc exploration.

lib/libnv/test/dnv_tests.cc and lib/libnv/test/nv_tests.cc are from later 
(-r279760) than the rest of the unmodified source code. This is in order to 
remove ambiguous overload issues.

> # svnlite info /usr/ports
> Path: /usr/ports
> Working Copy Root Path: /usr/ports
> URL: https://svn0.us-west.freebsd.org/ports/head
> Relative URL: ^/head
> Repository Root: https://svn0.us-west.freebsd.org/ports
> Repository UUID: 35697150-7ecd-e111-bb59-0022644237b5
> Revision: 381120
> Node Kind: directory
> Schedule: normal
> Last Changed Author: dbn
> Last Changed Rev: 381120
> Last Changed Date: 2015-03-12 10:13:39 -0700 (Thu, 12 Mar 2015)

I have gcc5 and clang36 ports installed. I've made no use of clang36.

On a powerpc64 11.0-CURRENT powerpc64-xtoolchain-gcc fails to complete its 
installation because powerpc64-gcc fails to complete its installation. The 
problems were 4 mismatched file names and one file also not put into staging. I 
copied appropriate files to the missing names and place and from that status 
the installation was able to continue and complete via postmaster with -C (as 
long as powerpc64-gcc was not in use rebuilding itself: some other compiler was 
in use for that activity instead).



===
Mark Millard
markmi at dsl-only.net

_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to